The software included in this product contains ed software that is licensed under the gpl. Software licensed with any gnu license can be used and even. The gnu general public license is a series of widely used free software licenses that guarantee end users the freedom to run, study, share, and modify the software. The lgpl was developed as a compromise between the strong copyleft of the gnu general public license gpl and more permissive licenses such as the bsd licenses and the mit license. Can gnu licensed software be used for commercial gain without selling the software. I have licensed every piece of software i have ever written under the. The word commercial is a bit vague in its meaning since no solid lined. The gnu general public license gnu gpl or gpl is a widelyused free software license that guarantees end users the freedom to run, study, share, and modify the software. Gil yehuda, i run the open source program at verizon media aka yahoo. Dont believe the hype, agpl open source licensing is toxic and unpopular.
If the application is only for internal use, then this is probably not a problem, since you are presumably not worried about your internal users requesting or using the source. Qgis is an official project of the open source geospatial foundation osgeo. Oracle offers a commercial license for all of its mysql software that is embedded in or bundled with another application. An author must consciously recast, transform, or adapt the gpllicensed software all of which are forms of modification before the gpl applies to the. Nov 08, 2015 software licensing gpl agpl bsd mit apache eula kris occhipinti.
Despite the critical role the gpl plays in the advance of linux, not many people understand its terms. The commercial license allows oems, isvs and vars to distribute commercial binaries of mysql software with their own commercial software without subjecting that software to the gpl and its requirement to distribute source. Many of stallmans coworkers had left to form two companies based on software developed at mit and licensed by mit. Apr 17, 2010 the agpl makes straightforward commercial sense we use it for our open source product, flint. Contrast this with the licensing of most commercial software packages, where you are allowed to load the software on a single computer, are allowed to make no copies, and never see the source code. A practical guide to gpl compliance software freedom law center. This is a guest post from exygys long time counsel joseph morris. There are a lot of different open source licences out there, and it can sometimes be a bit confusing if youre not intimate with the details of each one. Aug 26, 2008 this is a guide to effective compliance with the gnu general public license gpl and related licenses. Can i use the gplv3 license for my commercial application. This includes your obligation to release its source code, as well as granting recipients the gpl rights to modify and distribute the entire code.
Creative commons license vs gpl difference and comparison. Using gpl makes sence since we then are allowed to include most packages that we would desire. Free software in this sense is software which you are free to use, copy, modify, redistribute, with no limit. This article gives an overview of the gpl and important issues for developers who may wish to incorporate gpl licenced code in their own programs. Among other things, were often asking joe about software licensing issues.
Blenders gnu gpl license guarantees you this freedom. Its built with and comes with an awful lot of gpld software. Infecting means derived program violate gpl, infected means gpl program violate its own license. Open source licenses grant permission for anybody to use, modify, and share licensed software for any purpose, subject to conditions preserving the provenance and openness of the software. The lgpl and gpl licenses differ with one major exception. In accordance with the software freedom law centers sflcs philosophy of assisting the community with gpl compliance cooperatively, this guide focuses on avoiding compliance actions and minimizing the negative impact when enforcement. A copy of that license is included in this document on page x. By contrast, the gnu general public license is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a. This document attempts to draw together the main features of the gnu general public license v2 into a friendly and comprehensible digest and, in addition, to. If you want an example of including gpld software as part of a commercial offering, look at os x. The gpl series are all copyleft licenses, which means that any derivative work must be distributed under the same or equ. Gnu general public license v3 gpl3 explained in plain english.
Difference between different types of open sources licenses. There are two main elements to the gpl, designed to prevent open source software being exploited by their inclusion within nonfree, closed sourced software. The gpl is a free software license, and therefore it. Gpl version 2, version 3, licence apache, mit, artistic, eclipse, mozilla. Stallman devised an alternative to the commercial software license and called it the gpl, or gnu public license.
The agpl makes straightforward commercial sense we use it. You can distribute your application using a gpl library commercially, but you must also provide the source code. Contrast this with the licensing of most commercial software packages, where you are allowed to load the software on a single computer, are allowed to make no copies, and never see the. Contrary to myth neither the gpl nor the lgpl are viral, in the sense of forcing any software linked to them to adopt the licence. Software licensing gpl agpl bsd mit apache eula youtube. Another point about the title of your question can i use gpl software binaries in commercial environment. If software is licenced under a gpl license, can it be used without restriction in a corporatecommercial environment. Commercial software is any software or program that is designed and developed for licensing or sale to end users or that serves a commercial purpose. Gnu general public license faq gnu operating system. You can license your commercial application under the gplv3 license as long as you comply with the terms of the gplv3 license. The gnu general public license v3 gpl3 summarizedexplained in. Use of the manual is a subject to the following terms.
Jan 16, 2004 the answer to both questions is the gpl, or gnu general public license, the software license that governs the linux kernel and other opensource software. Dont believe the hype, agpl open source licensing is. You can license your commercial application under the gplv3 license as long as. Be prepared to license their own program under the gpl usually not a desired or viable option for commercial proprietary software. Why you should use a bsd style license for your open. Qgis is a user friendly open source geographic information system gis licensed under the gnu general public license. Gnu general public license, version 3 spdx short identifier. We recently had a discussion about whether to recommend mit, apache, or gpl to one of our nonprofit clients for their open source project. Apache 2 software can therefore be included in gplv3 projects, because the gplv3 license accepts our software into gplv3 works. Reading black duck softwares newest paean to the affero general public license. Software licensing gpl agpl bsd mit apache eula kris occhipinti. Jun 15, 2012 contrary to myth neither the gpl nor the lgpl are viral, in the sense of forcing any software linked to them to adopt the licence.
The free software foundation considers the apache license, version 2. Can i use gpl software binaries in commercial environment. Linus torvalds says gpl v3 violates everything that gplv2 stood for duration. The more free software well have in commercial environments, the less hassle well have to fix issues in production. The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. Can gnu licensed software be used for commercial gain. This is an attempt to clarify the most important issues. The agpl makes straightforward commercial sense we use it for our open source product, flint. Foire aux questions sur les licences gnu free software foundation. Legal issues are a constant source of questions and confusion. Using gpl 3rd party code for internal closed source project. This means that if your work is based on, or derivative of, a gpl component, and you distribute your work, it must be made available subject to the gpl. A huge amount of useful software is freely available under the gpl open source licence. For example, type the following command to find a copy of that file in your linux system for various items.
If software is licenced under a gpl license, can it be used without restriction in a corporate commercial environment. Jun 29, 2007 the gnu general public license is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works. The gnu gpl is the most widely used free software license and has a strong copyleft requirement. Most gpl version 2 software is actually licensed as gpl version 2 or any later version, or. The lesser general public license lgpl is a more permissive license weak copyleft. Since, these are the best known ffts it is a pity, but it illustrates the problem of license choice. Nobody is ever permitted to take it away, in contrast to trial or educational versions of commercial software that will. If you distribute or recommend audacity in any way, please cite our trademark by referring to audacity as audacityr. It keeps your code bona fide open source, so people who want to use and extend it noncommercially can do so without worrying about you at all. Gpl program is infecting and infected the parent and the child non gpl process proprietary and even other open source license from the perspective of law.
This article gives an overview of the gpl and important issues for developers who may wish to incorporate gpllicenced code in their own programs. You can get to it all, use it all, do anything you want with it. This page is maintained by the free software foundations licensing and compliance lab. Since the gpl is a license, the holders of the software are the ones who have the power to enforce the gpl. The software freedom law center provides practical advice for developers about including permissively licensed source. Frequently asked questions about the gnu licenses gnu project. When distributing derived works, the source code of the work must be made available under the same license. There are multiple variants of the gnu gpl, each with different requirements. Lgpl is used to license free software so that it can be incorporated into both free and proprietary software. Describes the ability to use the software for commercial purposes. Commercial software was once considered to be proprietary software, but now a number of free and opensource software applications are licensed or sold to end users. If i use gpl software in my application, but dont modify or distribute it. They either are the holders, or are connected with the holders. Preamble the gnu affero general public license is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works, specifically designed to ensure cooperation with the community in the case of network server software.
Our company needs to buy and use a proprietary software to get a. Jono bacon proposes the change is due to increased growth in open source in business, and a nervousness around the gpl in the commercial world. If you see a violation of the gpl, you should inform the developers of the gplcovered software involved. Can gpl licenced software be used in corporate environments. If you receive software under an open source license, you can always use that software for commercial purposes, but that doesnt always mean you can place further restrictions on people who receive the software from you. This license is aimed at giving and protecting all users unlimited freedom to use, study, and privately modify the software, and if the user adheres to the terms and conditions of the gpl, freedom to redistribute. The word lesser in the title shows that the lgpl does not guarantee the end users complete freedom in the use of software. The creative commons attributionsharealike international license version 4. Nov 10, 2005 the gnu general public license v2 gpl v2 for short is the most commonly used open source licence. Qgis is a user friendly open source geographic information system gis.
You may discover, however that these terms do not work so well in your favor, since one of the terms prevents you from a. What if my school might want to make my program into its own proprietary software product. Gpl code can be dynamically linked to binary proprietary code. May 27, 2016 a huge amount of useful software is freely available under the gpl open source licence. See also frequently asked questions about the gnu gpl. The licence of software included in ubuntu can not discriminate against anyone or any group of users and cannot restrict users from using the software for a particular field of endeavour a business for example. Jun 20, 2012 you can license your commercial application under the gplv3 license as long as you comply with the terms of the gplv3 license. The gnu general public license is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works. This latter point distinguishes the gpl from software licenses that prohibit commercial redistribution. Nobody is ever permitted to take it away, in contrast to trial or educational versions of commercial software that will forbid your work in commercial situations.
In granting you this right, the gpl requires that the source code you distribute is itself available under the gpl. Why you should use a bsd style license for your open source project. So we will not distribute software that is licensed freely for non commercial use. The gnu affero general public license is designed specifically to ensure that, in such cases, the modified source code becomes available to the community. Further problems with releasing a commercial version is that fftw is gpl and hence, the commercial version have to do without the fftw algorithms. What is the difference between gpl, agpl and lgpl licenses. Jun 21, 2016 this is a guest post from exygys long time counsel joseph morris. An example of a copyleft free software license is the often used gnu general public license gpl, also the first copyleft license. The license was originally written by richard stallman, former head of the free software foundation fsf, for the gnu project, and grants the recipients of a computer. Ffmpeg is licensed under the gnu lesser general public license lgpl version 2. Can i use gpl software in a commercial application software. Some features, such as support for some external libraries libx264 and libx265 for example and various filters, are covered by the gnu general public license gpl version 2 or later see commercial x264 license exception below.
The software that i am refering to is qgis which provides this description. The text of the gnu general public license gpl is in a file named copying in various directories in your linux system. The gnu general public license permits making a modified version and letting the public access it on a server without ever releasing its source code to the public. I would like to release a program i wrote under the gnu gpl, but i. Software licensed with any gnu license can be used and even modified. The usual disclaimers apply, this is not legal advice. The gnu affero general public license is designed specifically to ensure that, in such cases, the modified source. A practical guide to gpl compliance software freedom law. Approximately 70% of the projects in the software repository sourceforge use the gpl v2. Zabbix is free and open source software, however, if you use zabbix in a commercial context we kindly ask you to support development of zabbix by purchasing some level of commercial support. Loosely speaking, the gpl requires that you offer to make the source code available to whoever you make the binary available to. Apr 07, 2017 difference between different types of open sources licenses. Openfoam is distributed by the openfoam foundation and is freely available and open source, licensed under the gnu general public licence. You can support our efforts by making a donation to the fsf.
238 866 143 606 1418 363 1269 1323 1158 1027 198 575 996 272 63 830 634 1508 1511 489 58 532 12 997 996 124 806 91 983 101 672